Section 2. Ratio in the house

Select dates to read amendment and select a date from the dropdown to compare the changes.

Ratio in the House of Representatives

Summary: (Section repealed) Revising legislative apportionment scheme

Election Date: November 7, 1967

Votes For Ratification: 1315736

Votes Against Ratification: 908010

Percent for Ratification: 59%

Percent Against Ratification: 41%

Notes:

Amendment Source: 1967 SJR 24

Effective Date Source:

Ratio in the House of Representatives

Every county having a population equal to one-half of said ratio, shall be entitled to one representative; every county, containing said ratio, and three-fourths over, shall be entitled to two representatives; every county containing three times said ratio, shall be entitled to three representatives; and so on, requiring after the first two, an entire ratio for each additional representative. Provided, however, that each county shall have one representative.

Summary: Apportionment of general assembly giving each county at least one representative

Election Date: November 3, 1903

Votes For Ratification: 757505

Votes Against Ratification: 26497

Percent for Ratification: 97%

Percent Against Ratification: 3%

Notes:

Amendment Source: 1902 HJR 39

Effective Date Source:

Ratio in the house

Every county having a population equal to one-half of said ratio, shall be entitled to one representative; every county, containing said ratio, and three-fourths over, shall be entitled to two representatives; every county containing three times said ratio, shall be entitled to three representatives, and so on, requiring after the first two, an entire ratio for each additional representative.

Summary:

Election Date:

Votes For Ratification:

Votes Against Ratification:

Percent for Ratification: %

Percent Against Ratification: %

Notes:

Amendment Source:

Effective Date Source: